Skip to main content

Table 3 Genotypic distributions of the rs4132601 T/G and rs11978267 A/G variants between cases and controls according to different models of genetic transmission

From: IKZF1 genetic variants rs4132601 and rs11978267 and acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk in Tunisian children: a case-control study

SNP

Model

Genotype

Cases (%)

Controls (%)

 

OR (95% CI)

aP a

P corr b

aOR (95% CI)a

rs4132601

Codominant

T/T

43%

51%

–

1.00 (Reference)

–

–

1.00 (Reference)

T/G

43%

45%

0.60

1.15 (0.67–1.96)

0,58

0.696

1.16 (0.68–1.99)

G/G

14%

4%

0.006

4.07 (1.40–11.79)

0,009

0.027

4.21 (1.42–12.44)

Dominant

TT vs. TG + G/G

43.2 vs.56.8%

51.3 vs.48.7%

0.19

1.40 (0.84–2.34)

0.19

0.285

1.41 (0.84–2.36)

Recessive

TT + TG vs. G/G

86.4% vs.13.6%

95.8)vs. 4.2%

0.0059

3.80 (1.35–10.67)

0.006

0.027

3.91 (1.37–11.19)

Over-dominant

T/T + G/G vs. T/G

56.8 vs.43.2%

55.5vs.44.5%

0.79

0.93 (0.56–1.56)

0.83

0.830

0.95 (0.56–1.58)

Additive

–

–

–

0.027

1.56 (1.05–2.34)

0.027

0.054

1.58 (1.05–2.37)

rs11978267

Codominant

A/A

75%

81%

–

1.00 (Reference)

–

–

1.00 (Reference)

A/G

16%

14%

0.56

1.23(0.59–2.55)

0,49

0.588

1.29 (0,61–2.70)

G/G

9%

5%

0.15

2.20 (0.75–6.43)

0,16

0.30

2.16 (0.73–6.37)

Dominant

A/A vs. A/G + G/G

74.8 vs.25.2%

81.5% vs.18.5%

0.23

1.47 (0.78–2.75)

0.2

0.30

1.51 (0.80–2.85)

Recessive

A/A + A/G vs. G/G

90.9% vs.9.1%

95.6 vs.4.4%

0.16

2.13 (0.73–6.18)

0.18

0.30

2.08 (0.71–6.10)

Over-dominant

A/A-G/G vs. A/G

83.8% vs.16.2%

85.9 vs.14.1%

0.68

1.16 (0.56–2.39)

0.59

0.59

1.22 (0.59–2.55)

Additive

–

–

–

0.15

1.40 (0.89–2.19)

0.14

0.30

1.41 (0.89–2.22)

  1. aaP, aOR: p-value and odds ratio are adjusted by age and gender
  2. b P corr.: FDR corrected p-value
  3. SNP Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
  4. Bold faced values are indicative of significant association (p < 0.05)