- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Microsatellite instability analysis in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer using the Bethesda consensus panel of microsatellite markers in the absence of proband normal tissue
© Chialina et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
- Received: 25 April 2005
- Accepted: 20 January 2006
- Published: 20 January 2006
Hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant syndrome predisposing to the early development of various cancers including those of colon, rectum, endometrium, ovarium, small bowel, stomach and urinary tract. HNPCC is caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes, mostly hMSH2 or hMLH1.
In this study, we report the analysis for genetic counseling of three first-degree relatives (the mother and two sisters) of a male who died of colorectal adenocarcinoma at the age of 23. The family fulfilled strict Amsterdam-I criteria (AC-I) with the presence of extracolonic tumors in the extended pedigree. We overcame the difficulty of having a proband post-mortem non-tumor tissue sample for MSI testing by studying the alleles carried by his progenitors.
Tumor MSI testing is described as initial screening in both primary and metastasis tumor tissue blocks, using the reference panel of 5 microsatellite markers standardized by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) for the screening of HNPCC (BAT-25, BAT-26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250). Subsequent mutation analysis of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes was performed.
Three of five microsatellite markers (BAT-25, BAT-26 and D5S346) presented different alleles in the proband's tumor as compared to those inherited from his parents. The tumor was classified as high frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H). We identified in the HNPCC family a novel germline missense (c.1864C>A) mutation in exon 12 of hMSH2 gene, leading to a proline 622 to threonine (p.Pro622Thr) amino acid substitution.
This approach allowed us to establish the tumor MSI status using the NCI recommended panel in the absence of proband's non-tumor tissue and before sequencing the obligate carrier. According to the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) and the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors (InSiGHT) Database this is the first report of this mutation.
- Germline Mutation
- Human Gene Mutation Database
- Obligate Carrier
- hMLH1 Gene
- HNPCC Family
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an inherited syndrome predisposing to the early development of cancers of colon, rectum, endometrium, ovarium, small bowel, stomach and urinary tract [1, 2].
Since there are no premonitory signs of susceptibility to HNPCC, family history has been the primary method for identifying patients at risk. Defined by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC, the typical HNPCC family fulfill the following criteria (referred to as the Amsterdam-I criteria ): 1. Three or more relatives with histologically verified colorectal cancer, one of whom is a first-degree relative of the other two; 2. Colorectal cancer affecting at least 2 successive generations; and 3. At least one relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer under the age of 50. The fulfillment of these criteria prompted further genetics investigations. More recently it has been revised to take into account the prevalence of extracolonic cancer in certain HNPCC families .
This autosomal dominantly inherited disorder is caused by germline mutations in genes coding proteins responsible for the repair of DNA replication errors, which are referred to as DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes . DNA mismatch repair machinery plays a critical role in genomic stability, including correction of mispaired bases associated with DNA replication and recombination. Germline mutations in one allele of any of these genes followed by the somatic loss or inactivation of the wild-type allele leads to a defective mismatch repair mechanism. The current "gold standard" for assessing tumor DNA MMR activity is molecular microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. In most cases, it involves extracting DNA from both tumor and normal tissue. The DNA is subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of five or more different chromosomal loci that compare "microsatellites", running the PCR products through a gel to separate DNA fragments by size, comparing the tumor-normal pairs, and scoring for differences between the two. Instability at two or more out of five markers defines a tumor as MSI-H and prompts further analysis, as sequencing of DNA MMR genes. A number of them have been associated with HNPCC, including hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2, hMSH3, and hMSH6. Most of the HNPCC families in which mutations have been identified involved hMSH2 and hMLH1 genes .
A much less labor-intensive alternative method used to prescreen high-risk individuals for further germline mutation analysis is immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing for MLH1 and MSH2 expression. IHC testing may identify which gene to target for analysis.
We describe MSI testing in the absence of proband non-tumor tissue using the Bethesda consensus panel (mononucleotide repeats BAT25 and BAT26, and dinucleotide repeats D2S123, D5S346, and D17S250) and we report a novel hMSH2 germline mutation found in the family.
Three first-degree relatives (mother and two sisters) of a male who died of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma at age 23 contacted us for genetic counseling. A detailed family and medical history was obtained through interview with the proband relatives and their consent for release of medical records and use of the pathological tissue blocks still available.
As screening method for HNPCC we searched for MSI in the proband's primary tumor and metastasis tissue blocks. The absence of proband's non-tumor DNA for MSI testing was overcome studying the alleles carried by his progenitors. Once the MSI was established, a second blood sample was obtained from the proband's mother (obligate carrier but at the moment of the study still unaffected) to full mutation analysis of the hMSH2 and hMLH1 genes by direct sequencing. After identifying the family mutation, we searched it in both proband's sisters.
DNA preparation for genetic testing
Peripheral blood was collected from the three consulting family members and the proband's father. Genomic DNA isolation from their lymphocytes was performed using a standard phenol-chloroform extraction. DNA from the proband was obtained from the formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue blocks and isolated by microdissection of tumor, deparaffinization, proteinase K treatment, and ethanol precipitation .
Determination of MSI
DNA sequencing of hMSH2 and hMLH1 genes
A second blood sample was obtained from the proband's mother and forwarded to the Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics (City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA) to full mutation analysis of the hMSH2 and hMLH1 genes. The sample was amplified followed by direct sequencing to screen the coding regions of both the hMSH2 and the hMLH1 genes for germline mutation in the DNA.
After establishing the familial mutation in the proband's mother, located in the exon 12 of hMSH2 gene, it was searched in the proband's sisters by direct sequencing using a manual Sequenase PCR products kit (Amersham Biosciences).
Our work shows that the absence of proband's non-tumor DNA for MSI testing can be overcome by studying the alleles carried by his progenitors avoiding the need for initial sequencing of the obligate carrier.
Although BAT-26 has been reported to be sufficient for MSI-H detection even without normal tissue matching , careful interpretation is needed if MSI-H detection is based solely on this marker, since polymorphism at the BAT-26 locus has been detected .
A more sensitive approach has been reported using a quasimonomorphic mononucleotide markers panel (that includes BAT-25 and BAT-26) without the need to match normal DNA.
In the present case, we overcame the difficulty of having a proband post-mortem non-tumor tissue sample for MSI testing by studying the alleles carried by his progenitors. Microsatellites are inherited according to Mendelian rules like any other genetic markers. Each progenitor pass one of its two alleles to its offspring and by definition, the alleles present in the proband's tumor tissue but absent in his progenitors are the result of somatic mutation.
Mutation screening was done in both sisters to assign their risk to develop HNPCC and other related cancers. We found the mutation in one of them and opportune recommendations for surveillance and prophylaxis were given. Two years after that, the proband's mother, unaffected during this study, developed an endometrial adenocarcinoma.
We overcame the absence of proband's non-tumor DNA for MSI testing by studying the alleles carried by his progenitors, the natural approach for the research team due its paternity testing background.
This strategy allowed us to perform the screening for HNPCC using the recommended NCI microsatellite panel before sequencing the obligate carrier.
We consider highly probable the disease-causing nature of the germline mutation in the hMSH2 gene found in the family. To establish it undoubtedly, both immunohistochemical data of the investigated tumor and screening of at least 100 chromosomes in healthy controls should be performed. This is the second report of an HNPCC related mutation in Argentina, involving the hMSH2 gene . According to the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD)  and the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors (InSiGHT)  Database we are the first to report the mutation.
The authors thank Zdena Bartosova, Erdmute Kunstmann and Michel Toungouz Névessignsky for their helpful comments that improve the manuscript.
- Lynch HT, Smyrk TC, Watson P, Lanspa SJ, Lynch JF, Lynch PM, Cavalieri RJ, Boland CR: Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an updated review. Gastroenterology. 1993, 104: 1535-49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vasen HF, Wijnen JT, Menko FH, Kleibeuker JH, Taal BG, Griffioen G, Nagengast FM, Meijers-Heijboer EH, Bertario L, Varesco L, Bisgaard ML, Mohr J, Fodde R, Khan PM: Cancer risk in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer diagnosed by mutation analysis. Gastroenterology. 1996, 111: 1402-Google Scholar
- Vasen HF, Mecklin JP, Khan PM, Lynch HT: The International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Dis Colon Rectum. 1991, 34: 424-5. 10.1007/BF02053699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, Lynch HT: New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology. 1999, 116: 1453-6. 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70510-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peltomäki P, Vasen HFA: Mutations predisposing to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: database and results of a collaborative study. Gastroenterology. 1997, 113: 1146-1158. 10.1053/gast.1997.v113.pm9322509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Annie Yu HJ, Lin KM, Ota DM, Lynch HT: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: preventive management. Cancer Treat Rev. 2003, 29: 461-70. 10.1016/S0305-7372(03)00084-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shubata DK, Arnheim N, Martin J: Detection of human papilloma virus in paraffin-embedded tissue using the polymerase chain reaction. J Exp Med. 1988, 167: 225-230. 10.1084/jem.167.1.225.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loukola A, Eklin K, Laiho P, Salovaara R, Kristo P, Jarvinen H, Mecklin JP, Launonen V, Aaltonen LA: Microsatellite marker analysis in screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 4545-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duval A, Hamelin R: Genetic instability in human mismatch repair deficient cancers. Ann Genet. 2002, 45: 71-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pyatt R, Chadwick RB, Johnson CK, Adebamowo C, de la Chapelle A, Prior TW: Polymorphic variation at the BAT-25 and BAT-26 loci in individuals of African origin. Am J Pathol. 1999, 155: 349-353.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Suraweera N, Duval A, Reperant M, Vaury C, Furlan D, Leroy K, Seruca R, Iacopetta B, Hamelin R: Evaluation of tumor microsatellite instability using five quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats and pentaplex PCR. Gastroenterology. 2002, 123: 1804-11. 10.1053/gast.2002.37070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, Burt RW, Meltzer SJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Fodde R, Ranzani GN, Srivastava S: A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 5248-57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leach FS, Nicolaides NC, Papadopoulos N, Liu B, Jen J, Parsons R, Peltomaki P, Sistonen P, Aaltonen LA, Nystrom-Lahti M, et al: Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell. 1993, 75: 1215-25. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90330-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drotschmann K, Clark AB, Kunkel TA: Mutator phenotypes of common polymorphisms and missense mutations in MSH2. Curr Biol. 1999, 9: 907-10. 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80396-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roque M, Pusiol E, Giribet G, Perinetti H, Mayorga LS: Diagnosis by directed mutagenesis of a mutation at the hMSH2 gene associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Medicina (B Aires). 2000, 60: 188-94.Google Scholar
- Human Gene Mutation Database. [http://www.hgmd.org]
- International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors. [http://www.insight-group.org]
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2350/7/5/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.