- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Deletions within COL11A1in Type 2 stickler syndrome detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)
© Vijzelaar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 6 February 2013
- Accepted: 23 April 2013
- Published: 26 April 2013
COL11A1 is a large complex gene around 250 kb in length and consisting of 68 exons. Pathogenic mutations in the gene can result in Stickler syndrome, Marshall syndrome or Fibrochondrogenesis. Many of the mutations resulting in either Stickler or Marshall syndrome alter splice sites and result in exon skipping, which because of the exon structure of collagen genes usually leaves the message in-frame. The mutant protein then exerts a dominant negative effect as it co-assembles with other collagen gene products. To date only one large deletion of 40 kb in the COL11A1, which was detected by RT-PCR, has been characterized. However, commonly used screening protocols, utilizing genomic amplification and exon sequencing, are unlikely to detect such large deletions. Consequently the frequency of this type of mutation is unknown.
We have used Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) in conjunction with exon amplification and sequencing, to analyze patients with clinical features of Stickler syndrome, and have detected six novel deletions that were not found by exon sequencing alone.
Exon deletions appear to represent a significant proportion of type 2 Stickler syndrome. This observation was previously unknown and so diagnostic screening of COL11A1 should include assays capable of detecting both large and small deletions, in addition to exon sequencing.
- Molecular analysis
- Stickler syndrome
Stickler syndrome (OMIM # 108300, 604841, 184840), first described in 1965  most commonly occurs as an autosomal dominantly inherited connective tissue disorder. It is caused by mutations in collagen genes that encode the heterotypic collagen fibrils present in cartilage and vitreous, namely COL2A1, COL11A1 and COL11A2[2–4]. These genes encode different collagen α chains that co-assemble into either a type II collagen homotrimer (all three chains being products of the COL2A1 gene), or a type XI collagen heterotrimer that can contain products from all three genes . We have recently demonstrated the use of MLPA to detect large deletions encompassing the whole COL2A1 gene  but no equivalent system was available for COL11A1. The COL11A1 gene is approximately 250 kb in length, located on chromosome 1p21 and comprises in total 68 exons. To date, the majority of mutations in COL11A1 affect the consensus splice sites of exons encoding the collagen helical domain, and those that have been analyzed by RT-PCR have all indicated exon skipping. Because skipping of these exons leaves the message in-frame and the Gly-Xaa-Yaa repeating collagen motif in register, this results in mutant collagen α chains capable of co-assembly with α chains synthesized from the normal genes, resulting in a dominant negative effect [6, 7]. Only one large deletion (~40 kb) encompassing exons 32–43 has previously been described . However, this was identified by analyzing mRNA via RT-PCR, and so the commonly used strategy of amplifying relatively small genomic regions and exon sequencing means that similar mutations could easily remain undetected. Currently the frequency of such large deletions is unknown . The aim of this study was to detect COL11A1 copy number alterations using a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay . Here we present six examples of Stickler syndrome which display exon deletions of COL11A1 found by this technique, that were not detected by exon sequencing alone.
During a 2 year period between mid 2010 and mid 2012, patient samples, submitted to the Cambridge Regional, Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Service UK, were tested for genomic rearrangements in the COL11A1 gene using MLPA, as previously described . Due to the large number of exons in COL11A1 and the limitation of the number of probes which can be included in an MLPA assay, two different assays (P381 and P382) were developed.
Long range PCR was used to determine if certain exons not covered by the MLPA probe set (due to the limited number of probes in each assay) were included or absent from the deleted regions. Patient DNA was amplified using either Sequalprep [Invitrogen, Life Technologies Ltd, Paisley PA4 9RF, UK] or a long PCR enzyme mix [Thermo Fisher scientific; Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7GE, UK] along with primers known to be outside of the deleted area. Typical cycling conditions were 94°C 3 min followed by 10 cycles consisting of 94°C 30 sec, 55°C 30 sec, 68°C 8 min, followed by 25 cycles consisting of 94°C 30 sec, 55°C 30 sec, 68°C 8 min + 20 sec/cycle. The elongation time was extended to 14 min when trying to amplify particularly large regions of DNA.
The proband (male) was examined at age 7 months due to Pierre Robin sequence. The patient was not myopic and there was no sensorineural hearing loss. However there was a family history of myopia and retinal detachment. Examination of the mother showed her to be a low myope, with a beaded vitreous architecture. One probe set (P382) detected a deletion of exons 6–43, and the other probe set (P381) a deletion of exons 8–42, (Figure 2A) resulting in a minimal deleted region of exons 6–43 [c.781-3276, p.Tyr261-Pro1092] As exons 5 and 44 are included within both probe sets no further analysis was performed. In the alternative transcript NM_080629.2 this deletion would encompass c.781-3312, p.Lys261-Pro1104.
The female proband (Figure 3D) was examined at age 29. She had previously had a left retinal detachment. The right eye had an abnormal vitreous architecture with a beaded phenotype and a quadrantic lamellar cataract. There was a family history of retinal detachment on her paternal side. MLPA analysis (Figure 2E) indicated a deletion of exon 49 [c.3655-3708, p.Gly1219-Asp1236]. As exon 48 is not covered by the two probe sets, long range PCR and sequencing using primers encompassing exons 48–50 was performed, which confirmed deletion of exon 49 and that exon 48 was not included in the deleted region. The mutation was also confirmed in her father (Figure 3C).
A two and a half year old male proband was found to be highly myopic with a facial phenotype (maxillary hypoplasia and a flattened nasal bridge) suggestive of Stickler syndrome. No sensorineural hearing loss was demonstrated, but there was a history of recent glue ear. Examination revealed a beaded vitreous phenotype and a high-arched palate, but no midline clefting. Deletions of exons 41 and 42 [c.3025-3168, p.Gly1009-Val1056] were detected by MLPA (Figure 2D), as probes for exons 40 and 43 are included in the two probe sets no further analysis was required.
Two additional mutations were detected in DNA from other patients with Stickler syndrome (Figure 2C and F). These were a deletion of a single exon, 39 [c.2863-2916, p.Gly955-Gln972] and a deletion of exons 49–58 [c.3655-4302, p.Gly1219-Met1434]. In this latter case it could not be confirmed whether or not exon 48 was included in the deleted region, probably due to the large size of the region needed to be amplified by long range PCR.
Here we have described the design and utilization of MLPA probes sets that cover 57 of the 68 exons of the COL11A1 gene, and have detected six novel deletions in patients with Stickler syndrome that would have been overlooked by exon sequencing alone. All six leave the message in frame and the repeating Gly-Xaa-Yaa amino acid sequence of the collagen triple helical region in register and the C-propeptide region, through which type XI collagen chains assemble into heterotrimers, intact. So these mutant molecules are capable of co-assembling with normal procollagen and consequently disrupt their normal function. The six deletions described here were not detected by exon sequencing. During the same period that these mutations were detected, twenty two other COL11A1mutations were identified by exon sequencing in the Cambridge Regional Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, UK. [http://www.cuh.org.uk/addenbrookes/services/clinical/genetics/genetics_labs/contacts.html]. So, although the exact frequency of large deletions in COL11A1 remains uncertain, they would appear to represent a significant proportion of type 2 Stickler syndrome cases, and laboratories offering diagnostic sequencing of COL11A1 should include a protocol capable of detecting deletions of various sizes.
As next generation sequencing becomes a standard method of mutation detection in diagnostic service laboratories, it may be possible to recognize gene deletions by identifying regions where there is homozygosity and a reduction in read depth. This may be more achievable using capture methods rather than sequencing PCR products, where identification of large deletions may be dependant upon primer design. In the short term deletions identified by next generation sequencing may need to be verified by another method to confirm the mutation.
Five of the six deletions were confined to the collagen triple helical region of the molecule. One other also included the alternatively spliced exons 6, 7 and 9 which form part of the variable N-propeptide. However, the individuals with this region deleted did not appear clinically different from other patients with type 2 Stickler syndrome. This probably reflects that, as with the other multi-exon and single-exon deletions, the mutant α chains co-assemble with normal α chains synthesized from the COL2A1, COL11A1 and COL11A2 genes, forming an abnormally folded molecule that undergoes intracellular retention and degradation .
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of these case reports and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
We would like to thank the technical and scientific staff in the Cambridge regional molecular genetics laboratory for their help in performing and analyzing the MLPA data.
Testing of patients resident in England was funded by the Advisory Group for National Specialised Services and the Department of Health UK.
- Stickler GB, Belau PG, Farrell FJ, Jones JD, Pugh DG, Steinberg AG, Ward LE: Hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1965, 40: 433-455.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad NN, Ala-Kokko L, Knowlton RG, Jimenez SA, Weaver EJ, Maguire JI, Tasman W, Prockop DJ: Stop codon in the procollagen II gene (COL2A1) in a family with the Stickler syndrome (arthro-ophthalmopathy). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 6624-6627. 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6624.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vikkula M, Mariman ECM, Lui VCH, Zhidkova NI, Tiller GE, Goldring MB, van Beersum SE, de Waal Malefijt MC, van den Hoogen FH, Ropers HH: Autosomal dominant and recessive osteochondrodysplasias associated with the COL11A2 locus. Cell. 1995, 80: 431-437. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90493-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richards AJ, Yates JRW, Williams R, Payne SJ, Pope FM, Scott JD, Snead MP: A family with Stickler syndrome type 2 has a mutation in the COL11A1 gene resulting in the substitution of glycine 97 by valine in α1(XI) collagen. Hum Mol Genet. 1996, 5: 1339-1343. 10.1093/hmg/5.9.1339.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Myllyharju J, Kivirikko KI: Collagen and collagen-related diseases. Ann Med. 2001, 33: 7-21. 10.3109/07853890109002055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richards AJ, McNinch A, Martin H, Oakhill K, Rai H, Waller S, Treacy B, Whittaker J, Meredith S, Poulson A, Snead MP: Stickler syndrome and the vitreous phenotype: mutations in COL2A1 and COL11A1. Hum Mut. 2010, 31: E461-E471.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Annunen S, Körkkö J, Czarny M, Warman ML, Brunner HG, Kääriäinen H, Mulliken JB, Tranebjaerg L, Brooks DG, Cox GF: Splicing mutations of 54-bp exons in the COL11A1 gene cause Marshall syndrome, but other mutations cause overlapping Marshall/Stickler phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1999, 65: 974-983. 10.1086/302585.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Martin S, Richards AJ, Yates JRW, Scott JD, Pope FM, Snead MP: Stickler Syndrome: further mutations in COL11A1 and evidence for additional locus heterogeneity. Eur J Hum Genet. 1999, 7: 807-814. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200377.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robin NH, Moran RT, Warman M, Ala-Kokko L: Stickler syndrome. GeneReviews [internet]. Edited by: Pagon RA, Bird TC, Dolan CR, Stephens K. 2000, Seattle, WA: University of Washington, updated 2010Google Scholar
- Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G: Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: e57-10.1093/nar/gnf056.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bateman JF, Boot-Handford RP, Lamande SR: Genetic diseases of connective tissues: cellular and extracellular effects of ECM mutations. Nature Rev Genet. 2009, 10: 173-183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2350/14/48/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.