Open Peer Review Reports for: Comprehensive analysis of RET common and rare variants in a series of Spanish Hirschsprung patients confirms a synergistic effect of both kinds of events
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
23 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alessio Pini Prato |
13 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Hofstra |
2 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elias Zintzaras |
3 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Salud Borrego |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alessio Pini Prato |
26 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Hofstra |
26 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elias Zintzaras |
3 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Salud Borrego |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Salud Borrego |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
13 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2350-12-138 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.