Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Maternal angiotensinogen (AGT) haplotypes, fetal renin (REN) haplotypes and risk of preeclampsia; estimation of gene-gene interaction from family-triad data

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2, 5,
  • 4 and
  • 5
BMC Medical Genetics201011:90

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-11-90

  • Received: 20 January 2010
  • Accepted: 10 June 2010
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Preeclampsia is a debilitating disorder affecting approximately 3% of pregnant women in the Western world. Although inconclusive, current evidence suggests that the renin-angiotensin system may be involved in hypertension. Therefore, our objective was to determine whether the genes for placental renin (REN) and maternal angiotensinogen (AGT) interact to influence the risk of preeclampsia.

Methods

Three haplotype-tagging SNPs (htSNPs) covering REN (rs5705, rs1464818, and rs3795575) and another three covering AGT (rs2148582, rs2478545 and rs943580) were genotyped in 99 mother-father-child triads of preeclampsia pregnancies. We estimated relative risks (RR) conferred by maternal AGT and fetal REN haplotypes using HAPLIN, a statistical software designed to detect multi-marker transmission distortion among triads. To assess a combined effect of maternal AGT and fetal REN haplotypes, the preeclamptic triads were first stratified by presence/absence of maternal AGT haplotype C-T-A and tested for an effect of fetal REN across these strata.

Results

We found evidence that mothers carrying the most frequent AGT haplotype, C-T-A, had a reduced risk of preeclampsia (RR of 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8 for heterozygotes and 0.6, 95% CI = 0.2-1.5 for homozygotes). Mothers homozygous for AGT haplotypes t-c-g and C-c-g appeared to have a higher risk, but only the former was statistically significant. We found only weak evidence of an overall effect of fetal REN haplotypes and no support for our hypothesis that an effect of REN depended on whether the mother carried the C-T-A haplotype of AGT (p = 0.33).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that the mother's AGT haplotypes affect her risk for developing preeclampsia. However, this risk is not influenced by fetal REN haplotypes.

Keywords

  • Preeclampsia
  • Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
  • Relative Risk Estimate
  • Preeclamptic Woman
  • Preeclamptic Pregnancy

Background

Preeclampsia is a heritable, complex and serious disorder affecting approximately 3% of pregnant women in Western populations [1]. The underlying disease mechanisms are still unclear, but placental factors have been suggested to operate via the maternal circulation in causing endothelial dysfunction [2]. Maternal symptoms include hypertension and proteinuria. Early in a preeclamptic pregnancy, the spiral arteries are abnormally remodeled, leading to deficient placental perfusion. For preeclampsia to occur, however, reduced placental perfusion may have to interact with maternal factors [3].

Recent epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the risk of preeclampsia is determined not only by maternal predisposition, but also by a fetal contribution inherited from the father. Pregnant women whose partner had fathered a preeclamptic pregnancy with another woman were nearly twice as likely to have preeclampsia [4]. In studies of the risk of preeclampsia across generations, partners of men who were born to a preeclamptic pregnancy also had increased risk of developing preeclampsia [5, 6]. Despite evidence for both maternal and fetal genetic contributions to the risk of preeclampsia, most published reports are based on the case-control design that does not distinguish between maternal and fetal gene-effects. Moreover, most of these studies have focused entirely on maternal susceptibility genes [7, 8].

Preeclampsia could be associated with a specific combination of maternal and fetal alleles of the same or possibly different genes. Indeed, there are several examples of maternal-fetal gene-gene interactions in the literature. For example, placental factors (determined by fetal genes) have been suggested to raise maternal blood pressure, whereas maternal factors (determined by maternal genes) may counteract this rise in blood pressure [9]. Blood pressure is regulated by the renin-angiotensinogen system (RAS) through a cascade of AGT cleavage, generating the physiologically active angiotensin II. REN catalyzes the rate-limiting step of this cascade, the conversion of angiotensinogen to angiotensin I, and thus determines the activity of the system [10]. It is not known, however, whether the RAS system is involved in the basic etiology of preeclampsia or simply in regulating the maternal response to the condition.

An interaction of fetal REN with maternal AGT has been demonstrated in animal models. When transgenic female mice expressing human AGT were mated with transgenic males expressing human REN, the pregnant females displayed a transient elevation of blood pressure in late pregnancy due to secretion of placental human REN into the maternal circulation [11]. Similar results were obtained from experiments in a transgenic rat model of preeclampsia [12].

Given the strong link between REN and AGT, we aimed to assess whether there is a combined effect of feto-placental REN and maternal AGT on risk of preeclampsia in humans. We selected haplotype-tagging SNPs (htSNPs) covering each of the two genes and explored their combined association with preeclampsia in a clinically well-described set of Norwegian family triads from preeclamptic pregnancies. We estimated the effects of maternal AGT haplotypes, fetal REN haplotypes, and the combined effect of maternal AGT and fetal REN haplotypes.

Methods

Study participants

From January 1993 to December 1995, umbilical cord blood was collected from 8615 neonates delivered at the Stavanger University Hospital in Norway as part of a larger prospective study on risk factors associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Women who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia (n = 129), their partner and their affected child were invited to participate in the study [13]. Of these, one-hundred and two family triads were recruited in the study. Mothers and fathers donated peripheral blood post partum and gave written informed consent on behalf of themselves and their child. The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Ethics and the Norwegian Data Inspectorate.

Genetic analysis

Genotype data from a 40 kb-long region covering REN (GeneID: 5972) and AGT (GeneID: 183), respectively, were downloaded from the genome browser of the International HapMap Consortium http://www.hapmap.org and imported into Haploview 3.0 [14] for computation of linkage disequilibrium (LD) statistics, identification and evaluation of htSNPs. Only SNPs with minor allele frequencies > 0.1 and haplotype blocks in LD with r2 > 0.8 were imported. NCBI assembly 34 of the human genome and data release 14 were used. The exact locations of the htSNPs were determined using the BLAT utility at the UCSC Genome Bioinformatics site http://www.genome.ucsc.edu.

DNA was extracted from heparin blood using the QIAmp Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The selected htSNPs for REN [rs5705 (A/c; lowercase denotes the minor allele and uppercase the major allele), rs1464816 (G/t), rs3795575 (C/t)) and AGT (rs2148582 (C/t), rs2478545 (c/T), rs943580 (A/g)] were genotyped by the SNaPshot ddNTP primer extension method (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). PCR primers and SNP extension primers were synthesized by MWG Biotech http://www.the-mwg.com and are listed in Table 1. Threeplex PCR reactions were performed for each patient as follows: three pairs of PCR primers were amplified simultaneously in 12 μl reactions containing 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 1 M betain, 0.05 U/μl AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems) and 0.1 μg DNA. For each htSNP, forward and reverse primers were added to a final concentration of 0.2 μM, except for the rs3795575 primers that were added to a final concentration of 0.5 μM. REN threeplex amplifications were initiated by activation of the DNA polymerase for 9 min at 95°C, followed by 26 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec and polymerization at 72°C for 45 sec in a Master cycler XP (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). For the AGT threeplex reactions, forward and reverse primers were added to a concentration of 0.5 μM, amplifications were performed without betain, and annealing was conducted at 58°C. The resulting PCR products (5 μl) were cleaned with EXOSAP-IT (2 μl) (Amersham Biosciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden) following the SNaPshot reaction.
Table 1

PCR primers and SNP extension primers

SNP

Primer sequence (5'- 3')

SNaPshot product size

REN

  

rs5705

REN-F: CAAGAGAATGCCCTCAATCC

 
 

REN-R: CAAGCACTCACGTCCATGTAG

 
 

SNP-F: AGTGGAGCCAACCCATGAAGAGGCTGAC

29 bp

rs1464816

REN-F: TCCTTGGTTGGAGTCTGGTC

 
 

REN-R: GCTTTTCTTTTGCTGCTTGG

 
 

SNP-F: AAAAACACAGAGTGTGTGCGTGCAGGGTTGAGG

34 bp

rs3795575

REN-F: AAGAAGCCAAAGAGGGAAGG

 
 

REN-R: GAAAGAGATGTCGGGGAGTG

 
 

SNP-F: AAAAAAAAAAACCAGCGCAGGACTCCTTGTCTGCTGAGA

40 bp

AGT

  

rs943580

AGT-F: CACAGAAAACAGCGGGAGAA

 
 

AGT-R: GGCTTGGAAGTTGCTCGTAG

 
 

SNP-F: AGGAGTATAAAGTTGCCAAC

21 bp

rs2148582

AGT-F: CTGCCGTTGTTCTGGGTACT

 
 

AGT-R: CACAAGCCCTGCTATTCCTC

 
 

SNP-F: AAAAAAGTTACATCTGAGAGAGACAAG

28 bp

rs2478545

AGT-F: ACCACGACAACCTCCTTGAG

 
 

AGT-R: GACCCATTTCAGATGCCACT

 
 

SNP-F: AAAAAAAAAAGCCTGCTGTCCCTAGGAGAAGTG

34 bp

SNP extension primers were designed to target DNA sequences next to their polymorphic sites, with a 5'-tail differing in lengths of 20 to 39 nucleotides (Table 1). The single-base extension reaction (10 μl) contained 3 μl of SNaPshot Multiplex kit (Applied Biosystems), 1 μM pooled SNP extension primers and 0.5 μl REN or AGT threeplex PCR product. Samples were amplified for 25 cycles with 10 sec of denaturation at 96°C, 5 sec of annealing at 50°C and 30 sec of polymerization at 60°C. The reaction products were treated with Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (Amersham Biosciences) for 60 min at 30°C followed by 30 min at 75°C. The resulting AGT or REN threeplex SNaPshot products (0.5 μl) were added to 20 μl of Hi-Di™ Formamide containing 0.2% Liz 120 size standard (Applied Biosystems) and loaded on an ABI PRISM® 310 instrument (Applied Biosystems) to separate the products. Genotyping was performed in duplicate. For genotype determination, the results were analyzed using the GeneMapper software, v3.0 (Applied Biosystems). Genotypes of the REN and the AGT htSNP were validated by direct cycle sequencing of 10 randomly selected family triads.

Statistical analysis

One important purpose of this study was to demonstrate an approach for studying maternal-fetal gene-gene interactions. We used the HAPLIN statistical software package http://www.uib.no/smis/gjessing/genetics/software/haplin; [15]) to reconstruct haplotypes from htSNP genotype data and to estimate the relative risk associated with a single or double dose of each haplotype among the mother-father-child triads. An attractive feature of HAPLIN is that relative risk estimates for maternal and fetal alleles/haplotypes are unconfounded. Since our purpose was to estimate the joint effect of maternal AGT haplotypes and fetal REN haplotypes, we first identified maternal AGT haplotypes that could be associated with risk. Next, we stratified the preeclampsia triads by presence/absence of these maternal AGT risk-haplotypes to see whether the effect of fetal REN haplotypes differed significantly across strata of maternal AGT haplotype. A likelihood-based test was performed to test for such a difference.

Results

One-hundred and two mother-father-child triads of preeclamptic pregnancies were genotyped for three htSNPs covering REN [rs5705 (A/c), rs1464816 (G/t), rs3795575 (C/t); Figure 1A] and three additional htSNPs covering AGT [rs2148582 (C/t), rs2478545 (c/T), rs943580 (A/g); Figure 1B]. Three family triads were excluded from the analyses because of inconsistent genotypes between the mother, father and child. Duplicate analysis of the AGT and REN threeplex reactions was performed on the remaining 99 family triads; no inconsistencies in genotype were observed. Further, none of the htSNPs showed any statistically significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Example of a typical REN (A) and AGT (B) threeplex reaction A. The SNaPshot result of a homozygous carrier of the most common REN haplotype, A-G-C (SNP order: rs5705, rs1464816 and rs3795575). B. The SNaPshot result of a patient carrying both the AGT haplotype C-T-A and haplotype t-c-g (SNP order: rs2148582, rs2478545 and rs943580). Lowercase denotes the minor allele at the locus and uppercase the major allele.

REN and AGThaplotypes

With three diallelic htSNPs, there are eight possible haplotypes for each gene. We estimated, separately, the effects of carrying one and two copies of REN haplotypes among mothers and their offspring (a total of four sets of analyses). This was repeated for maternal and fetal AGT haplotypes. Haplotype frequencies, RR estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the corresponding p-values are presented in Tables 2 and 3. REN and AGT haplotypes with a frequency of less than 5% were excluded from the analyses because of the difficulty in obtaining valid RR estimates for rare haplotypes. Among AGT haplotypes, C-T-A was the most common (58.3%), while C-c-g and c-G-t had frequencies of 20.9% and 20.4%, respectively (Table 2A). Among REN haplotypes, A-G-C was the most prevalent (59.5%), followed by A-t-C and c-G-t, with frequencies of 31.6% and 8.5%, respectively (Table 2B).
Table 2

Relative risk estimates for REN (A) and AGT (B) haplotypes

A: Relative risk estimates (95% CI; p-value) for maternal AGThaplotypes (n = 87 family triads)

AGThaplotype

Frequency (%)

Single dose

Double dose

C-T-A

58.3

0.39 (0.18-0.84); 0.02

0.60 (0.24-1.51); 0.28

C-c-g

20.9

1.42 (0.65-3.12); 0.38

3.00 (0.93-9.93); 0.07

t-c-g

20.4

1.46 (0.66-3.20); 0.35

4.63 (1.46-14.7); 0.01

B: Relative risk estimates (95% CI; p-value) for fetal REN haplotypes (n = 90 family triads)

REN haplotype

Frequency (%)

Single dose

Double dose

A-G-C

59.5

0.63 (0.27-1.46); 0.27

0.36 (0.13-0.98); 0.05

A-t-C

31.6

0.86 (0.37-1.95); 0.72

0.40 (0.12-1.39); 0.15

c-G-t

8.5

1.45 (0.66-3.19); 0.35

Not estimable

SNP order for AGT: rs218582 (C/t), rs2478545 (c/T) and rs943580 (A/g)

SNP order for REN: rs5705 (A/c), rs1464816 (G/t) and rs3795575 (C/t)

Maternal effects

There was a significant protective effect (RR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8; p = 0.02) among mothers heterozygous for the most frequent AGT haplotype, C-T-A (Table 2A). Among mothers homozygous for C-T-A, however, the protective effect was weaker and did not reach statistical significance (RR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.2-1.5). Still, the estimated effects are in the same direction and indicate that presence of the C-T-A haplotype may be protective. As a result, we assumed a dominant effect for C-T-A in subsequent analyses. A risk of preeclampsia was also seen among mothers carrying the other two AGT haplotypes. Notably, mothers homozygous for the AGT haplotypes t-c-g and C-c-g had a RR of 4.6 (95% CI = 1.5-14.7, p = 0.01) and 3.0 (95% CI = 0.9-9.9, p = 0.07), respectively, with only the former being nominally significant. For heterozygous carriers of the same two AGT haplotypes, the corresponding RR estimates were 1.5 (95% CI = 0.7-3.2, p = 0.35) for t-c-g and 1.4 (95% CI = 0.7-3.1, p = 0.38) for C-c-g. Overall, the mother's REN haplotypes did not affect her risk of developing preeclampsia (data not shown).

Fetal effects

Our data showed evidence of a protective effect on the risk of preeclampsia among children who were homozygous for the REN haplotype A-G-C (RR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.1-1.0; p = 0.05) (Table 2B). In contrast, the child's REN haplotypes A-t-C and c-G-t did not affect the mother's risk of preeclampsia, and neither did the child's AGT haplotypes C-T-A, C-c-g or t-c-g (data not shown).

REN and AGTinteraction

To assess interaction between REN and AGT haplotypes, we fitted models with fetal REN haplotype effects into strata of families defined by maternal AGT haplotypes. One stratum consisted of mothers carrying the apparently protective C-T-A haplotype (57 family triads) (Table 3A), while the other stratum consisted of mothers who did not carry the C-T-A haplotype (27 family triads) (Table 3B). There was little evidence of an effect of REN in either of these strata. When we compared this stratified model with an overall model using a likelihood-based test, there was no evidence that fetal REN had a different effect based on presence/absence of the maternal AGT haplotype C-T-A (p = 0.33). We did not test for interaction between fetal AGT haplotypes and maternal REN haplotypes, as it was deemed implausible.
Table 3

Relative risk estimates for REN and AGT interactions:

A: Relative risk estimates (95% CI; p-value) for fetal RENhaplotypes when mothers carry the protective AGThaplotype C-T-A (n = 57 family-triads)

RENhaplotype

Frequency (%)

Single dose

Double dose

A-G-C

61.3

0.62 (0.22-1.71); 0.36

0.33 (0.09-1.19); 0.09

A-t-C

29.4

1.03 (0.38-2.82); 0.96

0.62 (0.14-2.79); 0.54

c-G-t

8.9

1.29 (0.50-3.25); 0.59

Not estimable

B: Relative risk estimates (95% CI; p-value) for fetal REN haplotypes when mothers do not carry the protective AGT haplotype C-T-A (n = 27 family-triads)

REN haplotype

Frequency (%)

Single dose

Double dose

A-G-C

55.2

1.53 (0.16-14.90); 0.71

1.0 (0.08-12.4); 0.99

A-t-C

38.0

2.40 (0.24-24.10); 0.46

0.89 (0.06-15.20); 0.93

c-G-t

5.8

0.60 (0.09-4.14); 0.60

Not estimable

SNP order for REN: rs5705 (A/c), rs1464816 (G/t) and rs3795575 (C/t)

Discussion

We found a significant association between maternal AGT haplotypes and preeclampsia in our data. This is consistent with the results of a previous case-control study of French-Canadian Caucasians, where preeclamptic women carrying the AGT A-Met-Thr (G1035A-Thr174Met-Met235Thr) haplotype had a 2.1 fold (p = 0.0008) increased risk of disease compared to control subjects [16]. In contrast, a larger British study - also known as the Genetics of Preeclampsia Consortium (GOPEC) - failed to replicate an association of maternal AGT haplotype with preeclampsia after analyzing 398 maternal (grandmother-grandfather-mother) triads and 536 fetal (mother-father-child) triads [17].

Except for a borderline-significant double-dose effect of one of the haplotypes, fetal REN haplotypes did not appear to influence the mother's risk of preeclampsia. A large-scale genetic association study of 394 preeclamptic women and their 324 offspring from Chile [18] found no evidence of association between fetal REN variants and preeclampsia.

Our hypothesis and analyses were based on findings from a previous mouse-model study in which strong evidence of a gene-gene interaction between AGT and REN was found [11]. Specifically, preeclampsia-like symptoms were observed when females carrying human AGT were mated with males carrying human REN, whereas pregnant mice derived from other mating combinations did not manifest preeclamptic symptoms. This suggests that human REN produced by the paternal gene in the placenta may enter the maternal circulation and interact with maternal AGT to increase the expression of symptoms of preeclampsia [11]. Similar results have been obtained from experiments in rats [12]. Since there is no evidence that the REN gene is imprinted, we did not differentiate between paternally-inherited REN and maternally-inherited REN when estimating the effects of fetal REN. There was no evidence of interaction between maternal AGT and fetal REN among our 99 preeclamptic mother-father-child triads.

Given our limited sample size, we decided not to test all possible combinations of maternal AGT and fetal REN haplotypes. One hundred triads should give adequate power (80%) to detect a relative risk of 2.5 or higher conferred by either a maternal or a fetal allele [19, 20]. Our study is under-powered to detect moderate gene-gene interaction effects; thus, we cannot rule out such interactions. There is, however, little evidence of strong interactions in our data.

Although REN is an attractive candidate gene for preeclampsia, only a few studies have investigated associations of REN with preeclampsia. For example, REN did not feature in GOPEC's list of candidate genes [17]; only AGT, angiotensin II receptor 1 (AGTR1), coagulation factor V (F5) and II (F2), methylene tetrahydropholate reductase (MTHFR), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) were investigated. Despite recent reports supporting the hypothesis that both maternal and fetal genes may be involved in the development of preeclampsia, only a few studies have investigated fetal genetic contributions, and even fewer have used a study design that can distinguish between maternal and fetal gene-effects. Identification of joint maternal and fetal risk factors for preeclampsia is important for better defining risk and risk outcomes.

In conclusion, we examined the possibility of an interaction between maternal AGT and fetal REN haplotypes by applying new statistical methodologies that can estimate these effects without confounding in a family-triad setting. We found an association between maternal AGT haplotypes and preeclampsia, and a weak association between fetal REN and preeclampsia. There was, however, no interaction between maternal AGT and fetal REN haplotypes. The mother-father-child triad approach is recommended in future genetic studies of preeclamptic risk factors since this design enables the separate estimation of maternal and fetal gene-effects as well as interaction of maternal and fetal genes.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the families for participating in the study, and we thank the midwives for collecting umbilical cord blood. This project was supported by grant 911111 from the Western Norwegian Health Authorities.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
(2)
Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
(3)
Craniofacial Research, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
(4)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
(5)
Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

References

  1. Redman CW, Sargent IL: Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science (New York, NY). 2005, 308 (5728): 1592-1594.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Roberts JM: Endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia. Seminars in reproductive endocrinology. 1998, 16 (1): 5-15. 10.1055/s-2007-1016248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Roberts JM: Preeclampsia: what we know and what we do not know. Seminars in perinatology. 2000, 24 (1): 24-28. 10.1016/S0146-0005(00)80050-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lie RT, Rasmussen S, Brunborg H, Gjessing HK, Lie-Nielsen E, Irgens LM: Fetal and maternal contributions to risk of pre-eclampsia: population based study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1998, 316 (7141): 1343-1347.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Skjaerven R, Vatten LJ, Wilcox AJ, Ronning T, Irgens LM, Lie RT: Recurrence of pre-eclampsia across generations: exploring fetal and maternal genetic components in a population based cohort. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2005, 331 (7521): 877-10.1136/bmj.38555.462685.8F.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Esplin MS, Fausett MB, Fraser A, Kerber R, Mineau G, Carrillo J, Varner MW: Paternal and maternal components of the predisposition to preeclampsia. The New England journal of medicine. 2001, 344 (12): 867-872. 10.1056/NEJM200103223441201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Medica I, Kastrin A, Peterlin B: Genetic polymorphisms in vasoactive genes and preeclampsia: a meta-analysis. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2007, 131 (2): 115-126. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Knyrim E, Muetze S, Eggermann T, Rudnik-Schoeneborn S, Lindt R, Ortlepp JR, Rath W, Zerres K: Genetic analysis of the angiotensinogen gene in pre-eclampsia: study of german women and review of the literature. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation. 2008, 66 (3): 203-208. 10.1159/000146084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Haig D: Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. The Quarterly review of biology. 1993, 68 (4): 495-532. 10.1086/418300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Le TH, Coffman TM: Targeting genes in the renin-angiotensin system. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension. 2008, 17 (1): 57-63. 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3282f2fd39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Takimoto E, Ishida J, Sugiyama F, Horiguchi H, Murakami K, Fukamizu A: Hypertension induced in pregnant mice by placental renin and maternal angiotensinogen. Science (New York, NY). 1996, 274 (5289): 995-998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dechend R, Gratze P, Wallukat G, Shagdarsuren E, Plehm R, Brasen JH, Fiebeler A, Schneider W, Caluwaerts S, Vercruysse L, et al: Agonistic autoantibodies to the AT1 receptor in a transgenic rat model of preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2005, 45 (4): 742-746. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000154785.50570.63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Vefring H, Lie RT, R OD, Mansoor MA, Nilsen ST: Maternal and fetal variants of genetic thrombophilias and the risk of preeclampsia. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2004, 15 (3): 317-322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2005, 21 (2): 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gjessing HK, Lie RT: Case-parent triads: estimating single- and double-dose effects of fetal and maternal disease gene haplotypes. Annals of human genetics. 2006, 70 (Pt 3): 382-396. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00218.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Levesque S, Moutquin JM, Lindsay C, Roy MC, Rousseau F: Implication of an AGT haplotype in a multigene association study with pregnancy hypertension. Hypertension. 2004, 43 (1): 71-78. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000104525.76016.77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Disentangling fetal and maternal susceptibility for pre-eclampsia: a British multicenter candidate-gene study. American journal of human genetics. 2005, 77 (1): 127-131. 10.1086/431245.Google Scholar
  18. Goddard KA, Tromp G, Romero R, Olson JM, Lu Q, Xu Z, Parimi N, Nien JK, Gomez R, Behnke E, et al: Candidate-gene association study of mothers with pre-eclampsia, and their infants, analyzing 775 SNPs in 190 genes. Human heredity. 2007, 63 (1): 1-16. 10.1159/000097926.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT: A log-linear approach to case-parent-triad data: assessing effects of disease genes that act either directly or through maternal effects and that may be subject to parental imprinting. American journal of human genetics. 1998, 62 (4): 969-978. 10.1086/301802.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Starr JR, Hsu L, Schwartz SM: Performance of the log-linear approach to case-parent triad data for assessing maternal genetic associations with offspring disease: type I error, power, and bias. American journal of epidemiology. 2005, 161 (2): 196-204. 10.1093/aje/kwi021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://0-www.biomedcentral.com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1471-2350/11/90/prepub

Copyright

© Vefring et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement